IdolGirl01 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 15, 2020 2:42 pm
I don’t know

either if I’ll watch the movie it doesn’t look right to me is it like the comic books?
Honestly...no. It looks like it's trying to mimic the Arkham video game armor, but does so very, very badly. We don't even have anything resembling a bat symbol on the chest anymore, just an abstract Batarang-ish shape. And the less said about the weird vampire collar on Batman's cape, the better. I get that in real life, the mask and cape can't be connected because it would make movement or even just taking the mask off a huge pain, but did it have to be this extreme?
It's not like a modern version of the classic Batman look can't be done successfully. The David Finch
Batman Inc. suit hits the right balance of contemporary and traditional.
All you'd have to do is use the same textured spandex of most modern superhero movie suits to give the illusion of high-end bullet-resistant material, and you'd be good to go. I would prefer a charcoal and navy blue color scheme, but would be fine with gray and black if the classic blue posed a special effects problem. Batman doesn't have to wear granny panties and off-the shelf spandex (no superhero should anymore), but there's no need to veer so severely from his classic look to the degree WB/DC is so insistent on. A more traditional look is completely possible to accomplish with today's upgraded costuming techniques. The problem is, WB/DC doesn't want Batman to be anything like his classic self anymore.
I'm not going to knock Robert Pattinson over this any more than I was willing to knock Ben Affleck over being saddled with a terrible Frank Miller-style Batman. Affleck was squandered potential, and Pattinson looks to be the same. This is purely on TPTB, not on the actor.