Agreed. Or perhaps Jazz Inc should have contracted professional fine artists capable of / known for museum-level, realistic 1:1 sculpts, create a Newmar head (no matter the TV series season), then scanned that as the base. The notable level of the current figure's inaccuracies, and the fact the company seemed to think the prototype was "it" / "good enough" to issue the product shot as part of their pre-order announcements strongly suggest Jazz Inc. was beyond corrections. The figure is not, especially when there were/are widely available, innumerable publicity photos of Newmar from either season of the series, and thanks to Blu-rays, there's additional high-definition sources Jazz Inc could've referred to in order to take even a step toward Newmar's actual likeness.BiffPow wrote: ↑Sat Nov 29, 2025 6:10 pm How would one verbalize the steps they should take to improve the sculpt? For me, there’s really not much guidance one could give to them beyond: “it doesn’t look like Julie Newmar.” They don’t need input from others to come to that determination or to make changes/improvements. They need only look at images of Julie Newmar. It just seems self-evident.
If the prototype used to pitch the pre-order is the final appearance for the item, then its a hard pass for me. I collect 1:6 scale figures based on TV and movie characters, and a few from series (Star Trek: TOS, Bond, Star Wars: OT, some DCEU & MCU movies etc.) but i've never been a completist, meaning, some series figures suffer from poor facial sculpts and/or body types, so its easy to pass on any of such low quality. For Batman '66 figures, the same guiding belief applies: extremely close-to-perfect likeness: easy purchase. Poor: the company is not getting a dime from me off by playing the nostalgia angle.

